![]() Not sure how much of a priority I will place on games though. My Lenovo Y470 (1366x768) is only 2 years old and it can still play games decently with the GT 550m, however, I plan on replacing it with a laptop at least a 1600x900 resolution, but preferably 1920x1080. A 1600x900 or 1920x1080 resolution monitor will give you more desktop space to work with. 1366x786 resolution gives you a small desktop meaning you can only fit so many "things" on the desktop. ![]() When not playing games, I like seeing as much as I can on the monitor. While, I think 1366x768 is fine for games, I find that resolution to suck for everything else (except watching movies/videos). Thank you for the information by the way.īefore buying a 1366x768 can you check out how 1366x768 resolution may look on a higher resolution monitor at a friend's place? It might not look too bad especially on a 1600x900 resolution monitor since the graphics will not be stretched too much. In that case I'll get a monitor that is native at 1366x768. This is somewhat of a difficult concept to explain, but hopefully my post helps you understand more than it confuses you. This in general causes images to look a bit fuzzy especially for edges or the boundaries of the images. Three pixels may be needed to represent that single pixel. The monitor then interpolates (or "guess-timates") where that pixel should be on a 1920x1080 resolution screen. The pixel at position 343x478 is supposed to be red on a 1366x768 screen, but on a 1920x1080 screen pixel position 343x478 is in a different location with respect to everything else. For example, suppose you play a game at 1366x768 resolution on a 1920x1080 resolution monitor. Pixel interpolation basically means the monitor guess where to place a pixel on the screen and if it is not in the right spot, then it can cause the image as a whole to look a bit fuzzy. An example would be watching a 1080p movie on a 1600x900 or even 1366x768 resolution screen it won't look very bad at all. The same thing happens when trying to fit a higher resolution image on a lower resolution screen however, shrinking higher resolution to fit lower resolution does not look as bad as the other way around. This is because a LCD monitor has a fixed number of pixels so if you were to stretch lower resolution graphics to fill a higher resolution screen then you will need to deal with something called pixel interpolation. However, if you are going to play games at 1366x768 resolution on a 1920x1080 resolution monitor and have the graphics stretched to fill the screen, then you will loose a bit of quality and sharpness. I play games on my Lenovo Y470 which has a 1366x768 resolution screen and graphics looks fine to me. My question here is for someone who is used to 720p on this ps3 will the graphics on games with said settings be bearable? Besides the fact that i probably can run these games on high with 30 plus fps on a 1080p monitor, I want to get the best fps I possibly can and even if I do get a 1366x768 monitor, I probably won't end up playing my games on high settings just for the sake of fps. I don't need my game to look absolutely beautiful I just don't want it to look bad, and also I plan on playing lots of demanding games on this monitor: arma 3, battlefield 4, and planetside 2. Go look through this article to see what you can expect to get with your 7850 playing popular games at higher resolutions: With a 7850 though, you should be able to get 30+ fps on high to very high settings with a 1920x1080 monitor though (in most games). ![]() ![]() They won't look bad, you'll just get less detail, a little less field of vision maybe, but it won't look bad. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |